David Cameron out of touch with
contemporary evidence say University of Nottingham academics!
David Cameron’s pledge to cut car whiplash claims has been challenged by University of
Nottingham academics and physiotherapists Roger Kerry and Alan Taylor. Backed
by leading USA researcher James Elliott, they have called into question the
Government’s exposĂ© of
the whiplash injury industry in the UK.
Whilst accepting the
critique of the unethical and corrupt practices within the ‘whiplash injury
industry’ and a justified call for an end to so called referral fees. Kerry,
Taylor and Elliott who have written extensively on neck issues and teach
evidenced based practice in whiplash injury, have called into question the
second layer of the broadside. Here there
is a suggestion that “all whiplash injuries are artificially contrived”,
therein casting doubt on the medical legitimacy of the diagnosis at all levels.
They contend that challenging the current argument is not
difficult. The suggestion for instance, that ‘whiplash Injury’ is not a
clinical entity is both ill informed, irresponsible and not up to date with
contemporary research on the subject. They are able to draw attention to high
quality objective evidence from internationally recognised MRI studies demonstrating
changes in neck muscle properties in people who have suffered whiplash (e.g.
Elliott et al 2010, Spine). Furthermore, they highlight trial and
experimental evidence has demonstrated that chronic whiplash associated
disorder (WAD) can be reliably indentified. WAD is thus, for some a very real
physical problem.
The Government’s
diatribe unfortunately, calls into question the genuineness of all whiplash
injury claims. This notion has, according to some, been supported further by recent
media reports of a Physiotherapist winning a so called “landmark case” proving
that ‘whiplash injury’ doesn’t exist (Daily Mail Jan 29th 2012).
These reports do of course champion the proposals, but are a predictable,
inaccurate spin of the facts of the quoted case, i.e. Robinson Vs Hussain, which
was not technically a ’whiplash injury’ case (in fact the exact opposite of
such).
For many involved
in front line care delivery, the unfortunate part of this politicised rhetoric is
that the proposed actions could easily lead to an irretraceable stigmatisation
of the percentage patients who genuinely suffer following road traffic
accidents. If wholesale changes to the industry are undertaken, there is
genuine fear that evidence-based health interventions will be withdrawn for
patients who have genuine, demonstrable WAD. It is important that before politically
fuelled knee-jerk reforms are made, that dialogue takes place between MPs and
health care practitioners such as Chartered Physiotherapists, who have been at
the forefront of clinical practice and research in this area.
Government
rhetoric may well be designed to galvanise public opinion and has clearly been
taken up with typical emotional aplomb by tabloids such as the ‘Daily Mail’. However,
it only serves to generalise and then stigmatise those patients who have
genuine complaints affecting their day-to-day function. Such patients may now,
in the light of this important new research, be identified by appropriate
evidence based scientific tests, which the Government appear to have
conveniently overlooked.
Roger Kerry
(University of Nottingham, UK)
Alan J Taylor
(University of Nottingham, UK)
James M Elliott
(Northwestern University, USA)
References;
Elliott J, Jull G, Noteboom JT, Darnell R, Galloway G, Gibbon WW. (2006) Fatty infiltration in the cervical extensor muscles in persistent whiplash-associated disorders: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Spine;31(22): pp 847-55
Elliott JM, O'Leary S, Sterling M, Hendrikz J,
Pedler A, Jull G. (2010) Magnetic resonance imaging findings of fatty
infiltrate in the cervical flexors in chronic whiplash. Spine;35(9): pp 948-54
http://feeds.myptsd.me/are-there-implications-for-morphological-changes-in-neck-muscles-following-whiplash-injury/
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/physiotherapy/index.aspx
http://feeds.myptsd.me/are-there-implications-for-morphological-changes-in-neck-muscles-following-whiplash-injury/
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/physiotherapy/index.aspx
Working within the Personal Injury industry I for one welcome the recent debate surrounding #Whiplash2012.
ReplyDeleteI am aware of the stigma created by the unethical practices of some which coupled with an increase in those deliberately pursuing fake "whiplash" claims for financial gain creates a perfect storm not only for political rhetoric but also for genuine change.
Like you though I fear for the genuine WAD sufferers - an example of which is on our Duncan Gibbins Website
This 'perfect storm' has the potential to turn quickly into a Salem-style trial demonizing all who claim whiplash injuries - genuine sufferers amongst them.
Whilst I welcome your research I am worried when I hear Jack Straw suggest that the cure to WAD would be paracetamol and reassurance. Sadly it seems it is not just "common" public opinion that needs to change.
btw Twitter Hash tag: #WhiplashIsReal
ReplyDeleteI love the analogy of the 'Salem Witch Trials' a cautionary tale of mass hysteria and lapse of due process! Nice . . . Jack Straw is not well known for his judicious use of 'evidence' his rhetoric intarring everyone with the same brush is frankly abhorrent!
ReplyDeletea common question for everyone - can I claim for a whiplash injury? in a whiplash injury compensation claim assessment - the first thing the court will look is the impact the injury has had on the claimant’s life. If the whiplash injury has, for example, left the victim unable to work or go about his or her everyday business for any significant length of time, the judge will assess this in calculating the compensation available.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete