Wednesday, 4 July 2018

A sudden rush of blood to the head: Why words really do matter in EVERY domain

So ... it seems there has been a proper furore and rush of blood to the heads (sorry ... that was a feeble attempt at a haemodynamics link ) of some folk, over the use/choice of a word in the @thecsp (UK) PR campaign ‘Love Activity, Hate Exercise’. 

The whole affair highlights the incredibly emotive power of words/word choice and how interpretation is entirely dependent on perspective and context. 

Love activity, Hate exercise?

Image: CSP
A similar attempt at influencing opinion was run by the American Heart Association  @american_heart (USA) in 2017, they called it ‘5 Steps to Loving Exercise ... Or At Least Not Hating It’. That blog campaign successfully conveyed the message that not everyone likes #Exercise and gave some practical tips that were designed to help non-exercisers begin to #LoveActivity or even exercise.

As well as promoting movement and physical activity (and exercise), one of the key messages of both campaigns seems to be that #Exercise adherents and promoters (I would place myself into that category) ... may find it challenging to see things from a non-exerciser's perspective ... The suggestion being that anything that helps facilitate a greater understanding of the patients perspective, and helps start a conversation, can only be helpful, surely?

That said, HATE is an incredibly emotive word and I've always encouraged my kids never to use it ... so I see the antipathy to its use. However, I can see the value in backing the #LoveActivity campaign, because if a patient uses the 'hate' word (and they do) as therapists we have to have the empathy and skills to deal with that ... It is a psychosocial phenomenon of our times and something we challenge our students to consider the realities of. 

Seems like Marmite ... you'll either LOVE it, OR H*** it … AND quite frankly, it is entirely your choice.

The ugly divisions that have ensued within the profession (and are still going on) are also a psychosocial phenomenon of our times, and times past. The only thing that has really changed is the platform and the players. There have always been differences of opinions and schools of thought. Social media has simply opened up debate and discussion to all. That is probably a good thing in a profession that is striving to change. However, what is clear is that it becomes very easy to create divisions, factions/tribes and to polarise opinion.

Q. Is that a good thing?
A. Maybe, maybe not. It depends on the context, perspective (and perhaps motive).

In Jeremy Lewis and Peter O’Sullivan’s recent BJSM editorial Is it time to reframe how we care for people with non-traumatic musculoskeletal pain?   
They suggested, “… Evidence informed self-management is the key. To achieve this, the efforts of many institutions, including educational, healthcare, political and professional organisations, health funding bodies and the media, need to be involved.” In essence what they were saying was that there is a need for a cohesive and consistent message from ALL invested and concerned with improving patient care. Those cohesive messages whether they are about assessment/treatment methods/modalities, or exercise/advice interventions, need to be evidence informed, consistent and convincing. Most folks are cognisant with the concept that nothing is written in stone, evidence evolves, and what we seemed quite certain about today, may be proved entirely wrong tomorrow.

Q. So, where does that leave us?  
A. It leaves us all, frantically trying to make sense of an ever shifting environment, conflicting stories, personal opinion, interpersonal/tribal battles and #FakeNews.

Q. OK … so what is the solution?
A. That is the 64 million dollar question!

It is also a question I been battling with for a while. Unfortunately, I can’t pretend to know the answers either … and I expect the answers will differ anyway, depending on a range of factors, not least the psycho-sociological environment from where you view all of this. It is my guess that regardless of your environment most folks will feel elements of uncertainty and confusion, whether they are (Physiotherapy) clinicians, researchers, teachers/academics or indeed patients … and it is worth reminding ourselves (wherever we may fall on that spectrum) that everyone his their own ‘coal face’ and everyone contributes to the landscape highlighted by the BJSM editorial.

Here are a few tips or considerations on how to survive in a constantly changing environment.

1.     Evolve or die: Sounds a bit harsh, I know, BUT it is a fact of life. History reminds us, that emerging research has challenged much of our previously accepted knowledge. In addition, much of what we believe to be true today will become obsolete within a decade or so. It may be helpful to recall that one previous profession linked to ours did eventually get 'wound up' ... they were known as Remedial Gymnasts

2.     Be less dogmatic: 1. Above, dictates that dogmatic thoughts or deeds are unlikely to yield results. No system, method, school of thought works for all of the people all of the time. There are (pretty much) always exceptions to any rule.

3.     Get comfortable in the grey: This is difficult but essential. Most folk prefer black and white answers of absolute certainty. I’m sorry, but 1 & 2 above dictate that you may have chosen the wrong profession if you expect or demand that from Physiotherapy.

4.     Be less divisive and collaborate:  When Lewis & O’Sullivan (BJSM) said “the efforts of many institutions, including educational, healthcare, political and professional organisations, health funding bodies and the media, need to be involved (in change, sic)”… they meant it! Clinicians, and patients, clearly play a vital part and social media opinionists require a sense of social responsibility, if they really want to be effective change makers.

5.     Don’t buy into phoney wars: Physiotherapists have always been caught up in hierarchical factions and been led by colourful gurus, still (unfortunately) are. Why there is a need to create divisions’ remains a mystery, perhaps it is the frailty of humans? Regardless, the created phoney wars, appear to serve no one (except those who create them) and simply retard progress.

6.     Recognise how language can be manipulated: Controversial … not really, just a reality of life in a World of fake news. Unspeak is a language style adopted by commentators who wish to make counter arguments untenable. It is a tactic (weapon) used by those who prefer to perpetuate division or phoney wars. It relies heavily on opinion (not evidence) and emotion. It is created to make any alternative viewpoint seem abhorrent or untenable.

7.     Be … pro-honesty, pro-community, pro-evidence and anti-division (if you really have to be anti-anything): See 6 above and ‘Unspeak’ below.

Q. OK … so what is ‘Unspeak’ and what on earth has it got to do with physiotherapy?

A. Unspeak is a term that was coined by Journalist Steven Poole in 2007 in his book ‘Words Are Weapons’. Unspeak has crept imperceptibly into the narrative of Physiotherapy discussions. It is a tactic to make controversial issues unspeakable and, therefore, unquestionable. 

This VIDEO is an interactive documentary investigating the manipulative power of language. Watch it! Once you have recognised it, you will always be able to spot the tactics in ANY environment.
There are many examples; perhaps the easiest to follow is the pro/anti abortion one. Pro abortion campaigners began to call themselves ‘pro-choice’ … after all everyone wants CHOICE, don’t they?

But … in a clever manipulation of language, the anti-abortion lobby quickly countered their opposition, by referring to themselves as ‘Pro-Life’ … because who on earth would argue that they were ‘Anti-LIFE’?

Q. Yes, and …?
A. Oh sorry. The reason this came up again, is because it has been part of the narrative of physiotherapy for a little while now, to demonise certain elements of physiotherapy practice by referring to them (without evidence) as ‘harmful’ … or ‘low value’. It has been highlighted again by the recent and ongoing 'Hategate' controversy.

Q. So what is the problem with that … ?
A. Well here at last, we get to the point … ‘harm’ is a very emotive word, a little like ‘hate’, in fact the two may be associated or linked e.g. “the deaths and horrific injuries (harm) that occurred in the fight, were associated to the long standing hatred between the two gangs”. An extreme example YES, but one that illustrates that harm can truly be emotive. 

To allocate the ‘harm’ to a harmless modality (name your own example HERE .................…………..) seems somewhat disingenuous to say the least. If a modality has been shown to be ineffective or uneconomical (from a health economics perspective) then say so, that is fine. When I railed against this on SoMe lots of folk misinterpreted my stance, but since the ‘hate controversy’ has blown up, we are back full circle to the harsh reality of word choices.

Q. Can you give me an example?
A. Sure. At my particular ‘coal face’ (UG and PG Physio/Sports Rehab Teaching), we have to try and make sense of all of the incoming information (from researchers, clinicians, policy makers, SoMe commentators etc.) and contextualise and disseminate it for inquisitive minds. With the luxury of both time and resources, we do our best to keep up to date, and appreciate how busy clinicians must find that really challenging. We also know a lot more about how the words we use in a clinical environment with patients can affect them adversely (or not, depending on choice).

At the end of the day, very few people WANT to do harm. So when a physiotherapy or Sports Rehab’ student asks if say, muscle knots or massage are ‘harmful’ because they heard it said on the Internet. We try to add some context and perspective, and use that as an opportunity to develop critical thinking.

Q. Yes, but you know this is not about physical harm, it is about adverse psychological effects. So what is your problem?
A.  OK that’s fine, I see that they do occur (in some cases). So why not refer to them as ‘adverse psychological effects’ or delays to diagnosis/appropriate care? I just feel uncomfortable (in the same way as those who who perfectly understandably, dislike the use of the word 'hate') with the use of the language as a tool for demonisation, particularly in the absence of either a clear definition or any evidence to support the statements that are made.

Q. The term ‘harm’ is used in psychological literature isn’t it?
A. Yes, BUT ‘harm’ in this case is clearly defined as adverse events such as measured deterioration of old symptoms/appearance of new symptoms, suicidal/homicidal behaviour etc. See, Reporting of harms in randomized controlled trials of psychological interventions for mental and behavioural disorders: A review of current practice. The same applies to drug trials, where harm e.g. adverse, physical or psychological events are defined and clearly quantified. Creating an environment where certain treatments or people who administer them, are seen as 'harmers' in the absence of either definition or evidence, is a disingenuous and divisive narrative.

Q. OK … what about the word ‘Hate’ in the CSP #LoveActivity #HateExercise campaign, it has been suggested that this has made exercise “unspeakable”?

A. Yes, I saw that, and  is an interesting turn of events. Because of my interest in the use/misuse of language I have thought about it really hard. I think it is important to look at the context in EVERY situation. First of all what is the intent? If the intent were (for some reason) to demonise exercise, then you could perhaps make that argument. BUT, as I understand it the campaign … it’s not trying to do that. Rather, as I said earlier, the CSP campaign appears to be a well-intentioned strategy to raise the awareness and importance of physiotherapists prescribing physical activity and exercise. Whilst at the same time, like the American Heart Association information, it recognises that a large part of the population are not natural exercisers. The question mark appears to make that explicit, as a number of commentators have suggested. However, those who are opposed ethically, to the word 'hate' (and many are) will always find it difficult to get behind a campaign no matter how well intentioned, that contains that particular word. 

Q. So how do we all move forward from here?
A. Well personally, I'd suggest that it has become abundantly clear that the power of language can unite or divide and perhaps everyone has learnt from that. Going forward, we should all be better equipped to spot the manipulation of language in narratives, wherever we may encounter it. As for the rest, I would hand this back over to the two evolving sages, Lewis & O’Sullivan

They suggested we should:

1. Frame past beliefs against new evidence.

2. When in conflict, learn to evolve with the evidence.

3. Acknowledge the limitations of current surgical and non-surgical interventions for persistent and disabling non-traumatic presentations.

4. Upskill and reframe of practice, language (in all domains, sic) and expectations.

5. Consider aligning current practice with that supporting most chronic healthcare conditions.

6. Better support those members of our societies who seek care.

7. Be more honest with the level and type of care we can and should currently offer, and the outcomes that may be achieved (Lewis & O’Sullivan BJSM, 2018).

To do all of those things, will require a radical change of mind set which aligns with the current challenging health care climate. It is a global challenge that is well recognised and which Physiotherapists the World over can rise to … IF and perhaps only if, they can bring themselves to end the self-perpetuated, unnecessary conflicts.

Q. Alan … doesn’t that sound a little Utopian.
A. Maybe… maybe not.

Footnote: There is no guarantee that this Blog does not contain elements of Unspeak. 

Author: Alan J Taylor is a writer and critic who thinks about stuff and works as a Physiotherapist, University Assistant Professor and Medico-Legal expert witness ... The views contained in this blog are his own and are not linked to any organisation or institution. Like Bukowski, he 'writes to stay sane'. He once rode the Kellogs Tour of Britain and worked as a cycling soigneur.

Wednesday, 1 November 2017

Massage: Confessions of a cycling soigneur .... (Part II)

This year the cycling Tour of Britain went right past my house. The rather eerie coincidence of the 175km Stage from Mansfield to Newark passing so close to home, has not passed me by (I wrote about a similar 175km stage in - ‘Massage: Confessions of an ex-pro cyclist – Part 1’).

In the follow up to Part I, I take a look at the role of the soigneur in professional cycling and consider the science behind the art. For those perhaps unfamiliar with the term, it is French for a caretaker or carer, literally a person who gives massage, and other assistance to a team, during a cycle race. My experience as a soigneur in cycling was short and sweet (I’ll explain why at the end of this blog) with stints on the Tour of Guadeloupe, Rapport Tour in South Africa,  and a follow up on the London-Paris Triathlon.

Tour of Britain
The job is much more challenging than many would appreciate and involves considerably more than massage. In short, the soigneurs are generally the first to rise and last to go to bed, though team mechanics (on rainy days) may dispute this. The key requirements for the role are organisation, stamina and an understanding of the sport. John Herety, Team Director at JLT Condor said, “It’s a long day, they work from very early in the morning to last thing at night. It looks glamorous from the outside, but it’s a hard, hard job.” He went on to explain that in the UK, the term ‘Carer’ is used more commonly since the dark days of the Festina drug scandal in 1998 when Willy Voet, the Festina Pro team soigneur was stopped by the police. In his car were the drugs the team needed if they were to have any chance of playing a competitive part in that year’s Tour de France. The story was told in Voet’s subsequent book ‘Breaking The Chain: Drugs and cycling, the true story.’

Nowadays, post-Armstrong, the sport appears to have cleaned up its act. Soigneurs still play a vital part in every team’s preparation, especially in the stage races (races that last more than 1 day) like the Grande Tours of France, Italy and Spain. The role involves everything from, driving to and from airports, shopping for provisions (nutritional needs of the riders), to making up bottles and feed bags, pinning on numbers, pre-race massage, handing up feed bags, through to post-race massage and even in some cases, washing/mending riders clothes … not to mention, acting as the riders confidant … this is no ordinary job.

So what is the role of the massage I hear you ask? Well, riders will make their way to the massage table in dribs and drabs, depending on the day’s events such as stage wins, crashes, visits to doping control, TV/Radio interviews etc. Then they will spend between 30-45 minutes on the table, receiving a full body massage with a bias towards the legs. Those legs of course, will have been pumping at 90-120 revolutions per minute for anything between 4 and 6+ hours (day after day) in the big Tours. Each team will have 3-4 soigneurs who share the volume of work. Most riders avail themselves to the skills of the soigneur, BUT there are a few notable exceptions. It is said that Chris Boardman former yellow jersey holder and Tour de France stage winner, was not a big fan of massage, but would occasionally take to the massage table to appease the GAN soigneur at the time.
Massage: A social interaction. Photo via

So what of the science?

Much has been written on the topic and massage as a 'therapy' has its fair share of critics and advocates (see here). It is fair to say that the evidence for its use is far from conclusive. In cycling, massage has always been a traditional form of preparation for the big Tours and major events by riders, coaches and team managers alike. So much so, that from a socio-economic perspective, professional teams will happily employ 3 or 4 soigneurs for the duration of the Grand Tours and major events throughout a season. Whilst some riders retain personal soigneurs.

So let’s consider a few questions:


Is massage always the same?

No. There are a plethora of different styles and applications, ranging from Swedish massage’ hands on to mechanical methods using foam rollers and devices/tools. This naturally makes reproducibility and research into massage very challenging. The most commonly used types of massage in cycling are hands on, Swedish style applications, but the exact method and style may be down to an individual’s preference.

Is massage always appropriate?

Short answer ... NO.

Pre-event massage immediately before an event, has been shown to reduce explosive power and speed. Hence most pre-event rubs tend to be more for the superficial application of oils or creams, especially in adverse weather conditions e.g. cold, rain, snow etc.

Why is it difficult to conduct research into massage?

The reasons are many and varied. As mentioned previously, each rider is different, their exercise and race protocols are different, techniques vary and their application is differs from practitioner to practitioner. Not to mention, the difficulties of setting up a sham control group. Most studies into the effect of massage have been small, in both numbers and effect sizes (see here) and compare to other dissimilar interventions. 

Physiological effects?

Emerging research (reported here) into physiological effects, is partially encouraging. Some studies have (apparently) shown support for the contention that 'massage attenuates the inflammatory response to exercise, as well as decreases pain, muscle tone and hyperactivity'. This research suggests that reductions in inflammatory cells and proinflammatory cytokines via massage may 'mitigate secondary injury associated with intense exercise, thereby reducing tissue damage and accelerating recovery'. This all sounds almost too good to be true, and readers should note that this particular small study has been comprehensively pulled apart by various commentators (here & here). Furthermore, a meta analysis in 2016 suggested that the effects on 'performance recovery are rather small and partly unclear'. However, a later systematic review with meta analysis in 2017 stated that 'current evidence suggests that massage therapy after strenuous exercise could be effective for alleviating DOMS and improving muscle performance'. 

To summarise, it seems that as things stand ... NO ONE IS QUITE SURE!

It has been quite rightly proposed that ‘future studies should attempt to use standardised protocols so that between-study comparisons in which only varied single variables, such as timing and dose of massage, can be examined’. This of course works perfectly well in Science, but is entirely non-contextual for the sport, or the individual involved in that sport.

So what about the psychological effects of massage?

Massage (mainly in small underpowered studies) has been reported to have significant psychological benefits, including increased relaxation and decreased expression of stress biomarkers (i.e. cortisol). However, the effects of therapeutic touch are a key area for further research and this comes in the light of recent research (here) suggesting that skin is thought to play a key role in the regulation of blood pressure. This may in part, provide a physiological explanation for the commonly reported relaxation and wellbeing commonly reported.

So what is the bottom line?

Well frankly, the jury remains out from a scientific perspective, especially with regard to the physiological effects of massage. The effects of multiple bouts of massage, either daily or at regular intervals over the course of the Grand Tours, has yet to be investigated.  Despite this, the suggestion remains that massage, to quote the BMJ 2017, remains 'an area worthy of (further) investigation, as we continue to advance the science for these therapies'.  

In the mean time, practitioners may be wise to avoid extravagent claims for what they are doing.

If however, we consider the psycho-social benefits of massage, there is perhaps an argument for its continued use. What is particularly interesting, is that whilst many pro cycling teams, have radically altered training programmes, diet and resting regimes for their athletes in response to emerging science, none have so far considered it prudent to remove or alter massage as an active ingredient of rider preparation.Whether this is down to science, tradition or a fear of rider rebellion, remains another unknown.

Massage, as suggested in Part 1 of this blog, may indeed be the ultimate biopsychosocial intervention, for there are (some) biological, psychological and social reasons for its continuation in the context of professional sport … and that truly is food for thought in an ever changing world. What is clear, is that there remains a demand for massage in sport (and other areas of health provision). Massage will continue to be delivered by those with the necessary skills, and whether ANY therapists believe themselves above and beyond that ... is frankly, entirely up to them ... and their interpretation the science, ethics, psychology and socio-economics of the topic. 

That massage as a therapy, has stood the test of time is indeed an interesting sociological observation ... and perhaps nothing more.

Massage in cycling - perhaps the most biopsychosocial of interventions


Finally a word of advice. 

It is worth reminding yourself that the role of team masseur/soigneur is one of the most demanding of jobs, both physically and psychologically. Having experienced both, first as a pro-cyclist and secondly a team soigneur … I can tell you for sure, personally, I would rather ride the race, and that is why my tenure in the job (as a soigneur) was very short lived. The final straw for me, was actually the 8 hours I spent bobbing up and down in a tiny fishing boat on the English Channel, trailing in the wake of a swimmer in the London-Paris Triathlon. BUT don’t let that put you off, it is also an incredibly rewarding role …but it is no ordinary job AND believe me, you’ll earn every last penny!

Author: Alan J Taylor is a writer and critic who thinks about stuff and works as a Physiotherapist, University Assistant Professor and Medico-Legal expert witness ... The views contained in this blog are his own and are not linked to any organisation or institution. Like Bukowski, he 'writes to stay sane'. He once rode the Tour of Britain and worked as a cycling soigneur.

Thursday, 13 July 2017

Massage: Confessions of an ex-pro cyclist (Part I)

Photo: Soigneur

With the 2017 Tour De France in full swing, it may come as a surprise to many, that every team will employ 4 or more masseurs (known in France as Soigneurs) and virtually every rider in the race will take sports massage as part of their daily routine. I’ve seen a great deal written on the topic of massage over the years (here, here), not all of it complimentary (forgive the unintended pun). So, rather than discuss the topic from the perspective of a physiotherapist, I’m going to make my observations on the topic from the recipient or service user, in this case, the rider. I’ll try to explain what compels Tour de France riders’ to take sports massage at the end of each stage, despite what the science may suggest. 

Why? I hear you ask … well partly, because (in what seems now, like another lifetime) I spent a number of years as both an amateur and professional cyclist and have more than a few tales to tell. I rode and survived 2 Tours of Ireland, 1 Tour of Flanders, 1 Professional Tour of Britain, and a host of other single day and stage races, during a long and occasionally successful career in the UK and on the continent. So, in essence, I have felt the pain and suffering of elite level sport, and spent more than my fair share of ‘time on the table’ under the hands of some of the finest masseurs/masseuses in the business.  

By way of illustration, allow me tell you a story that remains most vivid in my mind, relating to massage … it was the 243km 5th Stage of the 1988 Kellogg’s Tour of Britain, from Birmingham to Bristol. Unusually for a long stage, the race started from the gun and the peloton (big group of cyclists) was soon strung out in a line as the pace shot up to 28 mph +. We were in for a long day of toil, because not only was the pace high (and we had 4 days in our legs already), but then the rains came down, and the hills around Cheddar Gorge loomed ominously ahead. 

As the race splintered, I soon found myself in a group of non-climbers and we clubbed together to form what is commonly known in the sport as the ‘Laughing Group’ or autobus. That is, a collection of riders who ride together to make it to the finish inside the time limit for the race (a rider has to finish within a set percentage of the time of the stage winner, and the limit is pre-set by the race directors). The laughing group has a leader who calculates the timings and ensures the group tries hard enough to get to the finish just in time so that riders do not get eliminated (thrown off) the race. To do that, we all had to take our turn at the front, chain gang style, and I still recall today the pain in my legs as the cold rain drenched us, the grit blackened our faces, and the hills sapped at our strength and morale. The captain had done his job well and we limped in with 3 minutes to spare. I rode straight to the team hotel where I dropped my filthy bike with the mechanic. I wearily made my way to my room, where I quickly showered and lay on the bed in a fitful sleep, still shivering from the cold and the effort.
I don’t recall how much time had passed, but I was awoken from my fitful slumber by the room telephone, it was the team masseur. “Hey Al, you’re next on the table” he announced, with his usual enthusiasm. All my body wanted to do was sleep, I could think of nothing else. “Erm, I think I’ll give it a miss today, I think I’m just gonna sleep this off”, I said, rubbing the grit from my eyes. “No no … you’d better come down, the guys said you looked a bit pale when you came into the hotel, we’d best take a look at you, come on down now, I’m just two floors below”. “OK” I said weakly, unable to fight my corner, “Ok, I’ll be down in 5 minutes”. As I rose from the bed, I felt like I’d left my body and soul somewhere on the road between Birmingham and Bristol and my legs by this time, were aching more than I’d previously recalled, ever before in my career, I felt broken and drained. Despite this, I called on my last ounce of resilience and took the stairs down to the masseur’s room. It was a peculiar masochistic tendency of mine, just to see how good or bad my legs felt … they felt BAD, and I limped onto the massage table, already dreading the next day.

Photo: Kelly and Roche back in the old days.
Without batting an eyelid, the masseur said, “Tough day Al?” I settled onto the table and wearily began to purge myself of the story of my terrible day. I explained nervously, that he’d need to take it easy, because my legs were caning me from the efforts of the last 4 days, the rain, the cold, not to mention the distance. “I know … I can feel it”, he said confidently. Already a qualified physiotherapist by this time, I guessed knowingly, that he couldn’t really … he was just saying that, to make me feel better. However, I sensed that he’d started his work with a much lighter touch, and gradually he worked away at the thighs and calves, focusing on the sore spots that he found, with his skilled hands and fingers. 

After a short while he broke the silence, once he knew that I had relaxed into the session, “Big day tomorrow Al?” he said. “What do you mean” I asked, suddenly jolted back into reality. “Westminster circuit race”, he announced with a jaunty grin. “Oh” I said, suddenly recalling that we had a 100km race in the City of London barely 15 hours away. “It’s your big day isn’t it? Your chance to get up there with the big boys?” he announced confidently. Referring to the fact that flat circuit races like that were meant to be my specialty. “Oh” I said doubtfully. “Not with these legs”. “We’ll soon have you ship shape” he replied confidently, as the kidology continued and he kneaded and wrung my aching muscles. I sensed that he spent a little extra time on my legs that evening, as he worked hard to return the ‘souplesse’ (French word for flexibility and suppleness) into those tired muscles, and I could feel the pain ebbing away. As he worked, he talked, and we discussed how the next day would go, how I would find the strength and ability to play my part in the race with some of the World’s greatest riders (Sean Kelly, Stephen Roche etc.). Finally he said “Were all done, Al” … “Go and get some food, now the colour has returned to your face”. I rose gingerly from the massage table after 30+ minutes, truly feeling like another man.

'The pain in my legs had ebbed away, I was no longer broken … in fact I was looking forward to tomorrow, the finale in London, I was going to the capital city to finish my first Tour of Britain, and I was going to make it count.'

The physio within me was not to be fooled though, I did the ‘stair test’ on the way down to dinner, and sure enough, I could go down the steps two at a time, in fact I literally skipped the last two (bravado, I know). As I did so, I spied Sean Kelly sitting (looking a little perplexed, at my little leap), at a nearby table, quietly finishing his dinner with his team mates. I gave him a little wink as a strolled confidently past his table … I said (secretly to myself) “see you tomorrow big fella”.

The next day went like a dream, we took the coach transfer to London, and I felt like I was floating on air, yesterday’s ‘laughing group’ legs were gone, and I took my place on the start line feeling strong and confident. I truly did ‘mix it with the big boys’ that day. The 100km Westminster stage was won by the classy Dutchman Jacques Hanegraaf, and Mr Kelly, well he came second, perhaps because I’d made his legs hurt with my hard turns on the front of the race (ha, ha … that’s my story and I’m sticking to it). I finished that stage in the top 20 (my only top 20 placing in the whole race), for me it was a minor victory. As we sailed over the finish line I was close enough to Kelly to give him a little ‘frotter’ (French, to rub or chafe … riders use this technique to move through the peloton), he laughed this time, and gave me a friendly pat on the back as we coasted along on the momentum of the final sprint, our day’s work done. 
Photo: Sean Kelly

The masseur was the first to come over and congratulate me, “You rode like the wind Al” he said with a massive grin. I was high on the adrenaline of finishing my first big pro Tour in such exalted company. I said simply, “Well, if it wasn’t for you … I would never have made the start line today … end of!” He laughed out loud, saying nothing at all. I shook his hand as hard as I could, knowing what his eyes were saying … he was just doing his job.
So what does this story tell us, I hear you ask? Well it’s a simple story of a lived experience of massage from the perspective of a sportsperson, which I felt worth sharing. I wanted to share it because it illustrates what an incredibly powerful tool, massage and ‘time on the table’ is for the competitive athlete. 

The therapeutic alliance between the athlete and the masseur/masseuse during that 30-40 minutes is thought by many riders to be as valuable as training and sleep in the preparation for competition.

The naysayers and the sceptics will of course insist that my experience (and those of all of the TDF riders) was/is either a one off or, entirely down to pre-conceived expectations and/or the theatre of placebo. To those, I would say that the experience of immediate post race pain relief, together with improved mood, occurred time and time again under of the hands of good massage therapists AND if it was placebo … frankly as a sportsperson, truly I didn’t/don’t care.

As a therapist you should milk it, because if it means the difference between your athlete being able to compete at their best the next day (or not), then get comfortable with that.

Retro Jerseys FOR SALE!
For those who suggest that as an athlete, I should have built my resilience and not be reliant on passive modalities (such as massage), I would politely explain, that the half hour on the massage table is where I was able to cast off my demons, talk trough the tough times, plan my tactics for the next day, work on my kidology and actually develop my focus, my social support and therefore DEVELOP my resilience. Massage uniquely combines the power of touch with individualised sports psychology, there is no time during a competition where the athlete feel so at peace, yet strangely empowered and motivated, than on that massage table. 

My advice to therapists who wish to work in elite sport, is this:

Understand that there is a demand for massage within elite sport

Learn and understand the power of 'time on the table' 

Learn and practice the skills of soft tissue massage

Decide for yourself whether knots and sore spots exist in athletes muscles

Know your athletes inside out

Know the sport inside out (including the tactics and kidology involved)

Understand and accept that your 'time on the table' intervention may have a strong element of placebo

Combine all those skills and knowledge and APPLY judiciously

Put simply, there remains a strong demand for sports massage at the top level of sport. It is an intervention that just might make the difference between the starters and the non-starters, the winners and the losers. 

BUT it is worth remembering … this therapeutic intervention is as much about what you say, as what you do. Think of it not JUST as massage but rather ‘time on the table’, a vital blend of therapeutic touch and sport psychology, dare I say it … a truly biopsychosocial intervention ... where the physical, the psychological and the emotional are all considered equally in a holistic ritual.

Finally, I’ll just remind those sniffy cynics and sceptics out there, that this article was written anecdotally from the perspective of the service user (in this case, the rider) and is simply a description of one single experience (of many), which attempts to explain why elite athletes have such a long standing and passionate affinity with sports massage, and as such, it is not a scientific treatise.
Racing in France taught me a great deal, not least an admiration of the beauty of the French language. So, as this article has been peppered throughout, with French cycling terminology, allow me to take this opportunity to regale you of my favourite French expression of all …

“Jamais, péter plus haut que son cul.” 

I'll leave the translation, this time ... to you!  

Sound advice for anyone, methinks.

Part II of this blog, will discuss massage from the perspective of the race Soigneur/Therapist and will consider the science behind the intervention … and THAT may reveal a different story completely?

Author: Alan J Taylor is a writer and critic who thinks about stuff and works as a Physiotherapist, University Assistant Professor and Medico-Legal expert witness ... The views contained in this blog are his own and are not linked to any organisation or institution. Like Bukowski, he 'writes to stay sane'.